This was published last year on True Hoop, ESPN’s basketball blog – so basically the world’s largest sports news outlet:
We asked readers for suggestions on how to improve All-Star Weekend, so take it away, Bob Ngo!
The X games used to structure their best trick contest the similar to the dunk contest. Each contestant would get three chances to do their trick, and like the dunk contest, the trick took a few seconds, the announcers would go crazy, and the crowd would cheer and then that was it. It was ok, but there was a lot of downtime between tricks, between skaters, and this was especially felt if the skater did not land the trick.
Recently, they’ve switched to a “jam session” format, which I find to be much more compelling. Basically, skaters take turns, but they go immediately after the previous skater attempts a trick. I mean, I guess there are a few seconds between skaters but it feels like non stop skating for twenty or so minutes. This gets the crowd fired up and it gets the skaters fired up. Each skater gets caught up in the moment and knows that to do well, he has to outdo the trick that the previous skater just landed. It also, gets rid of the interminable time after a missed dunk because someone else is going right away. What you get is a contest where with each attempted trick, the tricks get increasingly more difficult, and increasingly more tense. By the end of it, the whole crowd is going nuts!
They say basketball is like jazz. In jazz, the true moments of genius come out of improvisation. Why not give the dunkers a format where they can show us their genius.
I dig this because I hate watching high flyers awkwardly walk around mid court, blowing on their cold hands while trying to generate some energy and enthusiasm in the current, over-produced format. Let them hype up each other (and the crowd) by creating a live mixtape of eye-popping dunks!
And these are the new rules for the dunk contest this year:
In the Freestyle Round, each conference will get 90 seconds to perform as many dunks as they can. This will basically be like what you see when a team goes up against the 2013-14 Los Angeles Lakers. Just a constant stream of dunking goodness.
Stuart Hall 1932-2014
There are lots of things being written about Stuart Hall today after he passed away last night. Most of the stuff that is being written is about how he is the “father of multiculturalism” and one of the first public Scholars from England to really transcend the boundaries of the academy. And this makes sense. His writing on gender and race in Great Britain has been extremely influential in the way modern leftists conceive of oppression and social justice. He is indeed a towering figure in the intellectual world.
I would write more about this, but to tell you the truth, I really don’t know much about that part of Hall’s work. No, I know him more as one of the leaders of a group of Scholars out of Birmingham, England in the late seventies and early eighties better known as the cultural studies movement. This group of scholars heavily influenced the way that I and many other in the field of popular culture studies understand the role of popular culture in our lives. Additionally, the entire field of American Studies can be considered an extension of the cultural studies movement.
Hall never actually wrote that much about popular culture. In fact, the one piece that he is known for is only 15 pages. The piece I speak of is called Encoding/Decoding. When I teach popular culture studies classes, it only takes about half a class period to go over the basic model. The encoding/decoding model is a generalized model for the production and the reception of culture, and the thing about it is, it’s perfect. As someone who spent a great deal of the last 10 years thinking about and researching popular culture, I have yet to find an situation where it is not applicable. In fact, when people ask me what was the main takeaway from my dissertation about Sabermetrics is, I tell them that “Stuart Hall was right and encoding/decoding works for everything.”
We academic types spend a great deal of time reading other’s people work with the specific goal of trying to find weaknesses in theories and arguments, and despite it being published in 1977, I have yet to find a valid critique of the model. Which is why I consider this to be Hall’s greatest achievement. The model itself is fairly simple – producers of culture encode messages that are influenced by the producers social and economic circumstances, and in turn, those messages are decoded by consumers of culture in a way that is influenced by their social and economic circumstances. Despite it’s simplicity, it has proven time and time again to be a powerful and illuminating way to understand how popular culture “does” things. A simple concept that almost completely explains a social phenomenon – what else could one want to achieve in life as a scholar?
Do yourself a favor and take a few minutes to read Encoding/Decoding. If not as a tribute to a very smart man, then at least do it to make your stupid self just a little bit smarter.
1. Nearly almost all of the things that you do unrelated to football, specifically being emotional after a victory, have exactly zero influence on how good of a football player you are and how you and your team perform during a game.
2. Relatedly, no matter how much of a douchebag you were as a coach at USC and in real life, it does not affect your ability to lead a team and organization. Denver looked completely unprepared. Did they not know that there would be pressure on the edge? Did they not know that Champ Bailey was a shell of his former self?
3. We already knew that the Seahawks defense was historic. But now we know that they are another level of historic as they completely shut down the greatest offense in football history. The Seahawks D should be mentioned in the same breath as the 2000 Ravens and the 2002 Buccaneers.
4. Vegas makes lots of money on the Super Bowl.
5. Bruno Mars is like really really really really short.
6. Joe Namath does not give a fuck what you think.
7. Neither does Bob Dylan, but in a bad way.
8. Stay away from smack kids.